![]() While both cameras offered 1080p HD video quality, that was where their similarities ended. While we wouldn’t say one camera was entirely better, there were clear winners for different categories of our necessary features test. Key Differencesĭifferences between the Arlo Pro 2 and the Blink XT were significant. We thought both cameras were worth buying but knew customers would make final decisions based on their preferences and requirements. The entire process took about half an hour. We downloaded the Blink app, synced the cameras to the modules, and connected each device to our phones. We had some trouble connecting the Blink XT to our Wi-Fi, but other than that, it was easy to set up. ![]() Overall, the process took about 15 minutes. We downloaded the Arlo app, connected the hub to the Internet, and pressed the sync button. The good news was both cameras used infrared LED lights, which were completely undetectable by the naked eye, and kept intruders unaware we were filming. We weren’t ecstatic about the night vision on either camera. The Arlo Pro 2 had an IP rating of 65, meaning it was protected from “total dust low-pressure water jets from any direction.” Unfortunately, the Blink XT had no formal IP rating, which made an objective comparison difficult. Like we said earlier, both the Arlo Pro 2 and Blink XT worked indoors and outdoors.Įach products’ International Protection (IP) Rating 1 told us how weatherproof it was. What did the Arlo Pro 2 and the Blink XT have in common? Indoor/ Outdoor > Learn More: Blink’s lineup of security cameras includes the Indoor, Outdoor, and Mini Key Similarities The Blink XT website said its battery had a two-year life, but many people complained that theirs only lasted a few months. Unlike the Arlo Pro 2, the Blink XT operated solely on batteries. Similar to the Arlo Pro 2, the Blink XT used a hub. The Blink XT was a simple black cube about three inches tall and wide. Overall, we liked the design of the Arlo Pro 2, despite its subtle flaws. We were disappointed in the magnetic ball mount Arlo advertised, as it did not deliver on the full 360-degree range of motion Arlo promised. In order to work, the camera needed to be placed within 140 feet of the hub. The Arlo Pro 2 came with a rectangular hub that connected to the Internet through an ethernet cable. Of course, we knew that using only battery power meant changing our battery every three to six months. We appreciated the flexibility, especially for outdoor usage. We liked that Arlo Pro 2 worked while plugged into an outlet or using battery power. ![]() The camera had a shiny white plastic exterior surrounding its reflective black face. The Arlo Pro 2 was about five ounces, which seemed a bit heavy for an object only a few inches tall. ![]() Let’s see how their design impacted our experience with both cameras. On the other hand, the Blink XT is cube-shaped, almost like a square tile. The Arlo Pro 2 looks like an actual security camera, similar to the bullet-shaped outdoor cameras we see often, only sleeker. The main difference between the Arlo Pro 2 and the Blink XT is the design. The Arlo Pro 2 and Blink XT are different in many areas, but one area stood out immediately. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |